There are several methods of methadone titration based on the level of expertise of the clinician involved, the availability of the patient for review and assessment and the urgency of achieving optimal pain relief. They can be categorised according to:
This is method that has been popularised by Makin-Morley in the 1990’s (12) It is based on a ‘de novo’ titration of methadone that takes partial account of the dose of the previous opioid used but is mainly determined by the ability of the patient to signal when the pain is returning to administer the next dose of methadone whilst observing the patient very closely throughout the process for signs of opioid toxicity.
In the hands of experts, it can allow a rapid titration and control of the pain within a few days of starting methadone and can be completed in most cases within 10 days to two weeks. It requires clear safeguards including opioid side-effects monitoring, frequent reviews by nursing staff to ensure patients are not left in pain and side-effects are closely monitored and documented. It also requires a strong commitment of the medical team to daily reviews (sometimes several times per day) and availability out of hours to advice, including face to face reviews.
It can only be done as an in-patient in a specialist unit. For teams that are not so experienced, it is possible to use this method but additional measures such a lower starting methadone dose and allowing the use of another opioid for pain breakthrough will reduce the risks but will inevitably delay the titration process.
This method involves continuing with the previous opioid both in the form of background pain relief and management of breakthrough pain episodes. The aim may be simply to spare the use of the other opioid and stop the titration when both patient and clinician believe the current level of pain relief is satisfactory. However, in most cases, it should be possible to complete the switch in full over time.
This method is suitable for outpatient titration, or as an inpatient, when the patient’s ability to cooperate with the titration process is limited by anxiety and difficulties to report and verbalise pain levels.
Sometimes, the patient and the clinician agree that inpatient titration is not desirable, or the degree of urgency to improve pain control is considered low. If that method is adopted, patients must be warned that it can take several weeks until they start benefiting from clinically significant pain relief.
The basic principle of this method is the slow upwards titration of methadone and the down titration of the previous (or alternative) opioid(s). It is not possible to give detailed guidance on how frequently dose changes can be made as it depends on the frequency of clinical review. A minimum of 5 days is required to ascertain the tolerance of a given dose before a dose increase should be considered. The first week is the critical time to evaluate tolerance to methadone and once the exposure exceeds 4 weeks, the risk of significant toxicity following dose increases becomes low, allowing for more substantial dose increases if required.
The addition of a relatively small dose of methadone is reported to benefit patients with cancer-related pain who have failed to obtain adequate relief from an appropriately titrated dose of morphine or other strong opioid (17). It is most suited to complex nociceptive-neuropathic pain that is poorly controlled despite use of adjuvant analgesics. In this method, existing opioids are continued as methadone is introduced or increased.
This method is suitable for outpatient titration, or as an inpatient, when the patient’s ability to cooperate with the titration process is limited for example due to anxiety or difficulties to report and verbalise pain levels. When using methadone as an adjuvant, depending on the patient’s clinical circumstances (renal function, weight, opioid sensitivity, side effects), it is not necessary to reduce the original opioid on the first methadone dose. However, on subsequent titration of methadone, it would be worth considering reduction in opioid dosing depending on the benefits that the patient is getting from the methadone (16).
(See references 3,5,6,12)
These Guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals and the expectation is that they will use clinical judgement, medical, and nursing knowledge in applying the general principles and recommendations contained within. They are not meant to replace the many available texts on the subject of palliative care.
Some of the management strategies describe the use of drugs outside their licensed indications. They are, however, established and accepted good practice. Please refer to the current BNF for further guidance.
Whilst SPAGG takes every care to compile accurate information , we cannot guarantee its correctness and completeness, and it is subject to change. We do not accept responsibility for any loss, damage or expense resulting from the use of this information.